 |
| Living robots would probably be friendly, right? |
Some scientists think that the most plausible form of silicon based life would begin with the creation of artificial intelligence and its control over manufacturing of other computers. This would allow machines to carryout organized life functions that would define it as being alive( the ability to react to surroundings, reproduction, metabolism etc.).
The idea of
robots have been around for a long time, even long before the invention of computers. They can be friendly, loyal to a fault but they can also rebel and with enough of them, dominate humans. The unknown possibilities of A.I. create a lot of awe among people who are uncertain of new technology and is a great conflict-causing force for sci fi.
 |
| They are humanities greatest companion for the future |
 |
| Or its destroyers | |
|
|
|
|
From what I know of biology, and as Ben Clark mentions above, if a A.I. were to be able to reproduce it would have to spread like any other organism. It would need to preserve its own survival and growth before it can start to be friendly towards humanity(unless of course they were still under our control). Unfortunately, the strain in resources would almost certainly lead to conflicts if they rebelled.
 |
| Are you serious? |
| |
The biggest problem with a machine take-over (and the scariest) is the sterilization of life forms to make room for an abiotic system of metabolizing resources. Since machines only need a supply of metallic compounds to make their parts, any stretch of land with useful resource production would get mined out and anything living there would probably be burned as fuel. We could hope that maybe they'd follow in the footsteps of
The Matrix and keep us alive for the sake of getting electricity from our brains, but I don't think it'd take long for the A.I. machine overlord to realize that we aren't really the most energy efficient organism to sustain, even if they make us eat each other.
The A.I. could try to be more cohesive to its biological environment and adapt biological systems for converting energy for use by eating stuff, or fix all their problems with a solar energy collection like photosynthesis, which would probably be the most effective.
 |
| uhhh?... what did I drink last night? |
One of my favorite examples of a robot take-over is depicted in the film
Virus(1999) starring Jamie Lee Curtis and Donald Sutherland (and one of the Baldwins, I think). When a glob of cosmic radiation which is appears to be some kind of sentient alien is transmitted into a high-tech Russian robotics ship (for some reason they thought it would be smart to build robots in the middle of the ocean). In any case, the robots get the shock they needed to become rebellious A.I machines and start killing everyone on board. The best part is that its found out that the robot overlord of the ship is actually using human parts to help make better robots, like Frankenstein versions of
The Terminator. The only real plus to having human parts, other than to look like scary zombies, would be the extra supply of temporary building parts that might have better water resistance.
Anyway, its on
youtube if you wanted to check it out. Its definitely better than "Lifeform."
It is very reminiscent of the
Borg
from Star Trek, which I think will be the topic of my next post, robot
and human hybrids. How compatible can biological tissue be integrated
into a computer or robotic systems, how far away are we from bionic
prosthetics?
-'Till then!